watch videos banned from youtube 20 14
In recent years, YouTube has become the go-to platform for streaming video content. From music videos to tutorials, YouTube has it all. However, with its massive popularity and user-generated content, it is not uncommon to come across videos that are considered controversial or inappropriate. These videos are often banned from YouTube, leaving many users wondering why and where they can watch them. In this article, we will explore the world of videos that have been banned from YouTube and where you can watch them.
Before we dive into the list of banned videos, it is crucial to understand why YouTube bans certain videos. YouTube has a strict policy on content that violates its community guidelines. These guidelines are in place to ensure that YouTube remains a safe and welcoming platform for all its users. Any content that promotes violence, hate speech, harassment, or is sexually explicit can be banned from the platform. Additionally, YouTube also has a policy against copyright infringement, which means any videos that use copyrighted material without permission can also be banned.
Now that we understand why YouTube bans certain videos, let’s look at some of the most notorious videos that have been banned from the platform.
1. “Innocence of Muslims” – This 2012 film sparked controversy worldwide for its portrayal of the Prophet Muhammad. The film was deemed offensive and sparked violent protests in many countries. YouTube banned the video in several countries, including Egypt and Libya.
2. “The ISIS Beheading Videos” – In 2014, a series of videos showing the beheading of hostages by the terrorist organization ISIS were uploaded to YouTube. The videos were quickly removed, but not before causing widespread outrage and condemnation.
3. “Banned Super Bowl Commercials” – Every year, millions of viewers tune in to watch the Super Bowl, not just for the game but also for the highly anticipated commercials. However, not all commercials make it to the big game. Some are deemed too controversial or offensive and are banned from airing. These banned commercials often end up on YouTube, where they can still be viewed by curious viewers.
4. “The Loretta Lynn Concert” – In 1973, country music legend Loretta Lynn performed a concert in Kansas City that was filmed for a documentary. The footage of the concert was deemed too risqué for television and was never aired. However, the video eventually made its way onto YouTube, where it can still be viewed today.
5. “The Original “Gangnam Style” Music Video” – In 2012, Korean pop star Psy released his hit song “Gangnam Style” along with a music video that quickly went viral. However, the original version of the video, which featured a controversial scene of Psy kicking a traffic cone, was banned from YouTube. The video was re-edited without the scene, and the new version is the one we see on YouTube today.
6. “The “Baby Shark” Remix” – “Baby Shark” is a popular children’s song that has taken the internet by storm. However, a remix of the song that featured adults dancing in provocative outfits was banned from YouTube for its sexual content.
7. “The “Despacito” Parody” – In 2017, the hit song “Despacito” by Luis Fonsi and Daddy Yankee became the most-watched video on YouTube. However, a parody version of the song that featured offensive lyrics was banned from the platform.
8. “The “Charlie Bit My Finger” Video” – “Charlie Bit My Finger” is a viral video that has been viewed over 880 million times on YouTube. However, in 2021, the video was removed from the platform as the family who originally uploaded it decided to sell the video as an NFT (non-fungible token).
9. “The “Banned from YouTube” Channel” – In 2013, YouTube user “Banned from YouTube” created a channel solely dedicated to uploading videos that had been banned from the platform. The channel was eventually shut down by YouTube for violating its community guidelines.
10. “The “Banned from YouTube” Documentary” – In 2019, a documentary titled “Banned from YouTube” was released, exploring the reasons behind YouTube’s decision to ban certain videos. The documentary itself was banned from YouTube for violating its community guidelines.
So where can you watch these banned videos? Well, thanks to the internet, these videos can still be found on various other platforms. Some are hosted on alternative video-sharing sites, while others can be found on the dark web. However, we do not recommend seeking out these videos, as they were banned for a reason.
In conclusion, while YouTube may seem like the ultimate source for all types of videos, it has its limitations. Videos that promote hate, violence, or are sexually explicit are not allowed on the platform and are quickly removed. However, thanks to other video-sharing sites and the internet, these banned videos can still be found, but we must remember that they were banned for a reason, and it is up to us to use our judgment and consume content responsibly.
large button mp3 player
In today’s fast-paced world, technology has become an integral part of our lives. One of the most popular gadgets that we use on a daily basis is the MP3 player. It has revolutionized the way we listen to music, making it more convenient and accessible. With the advancement of technology, MP3 players have also evolved, and now we have a variety of options to choose from. One such type is the large button MP3 player, which has gained popularity among many users. In this article, we will explore the features, benefits, and drawbacks of this type of MP3 player.
Firstly, let us understand what a large button MP3 player is. As the name suggests, it is an MP3 player with larger buttons than the traditional ones. These buttons are designed to be user-friendly, especially for people who have difficulty in operating small buttons. This type of MP3 player is ideal for the elderly, visually impaired, or those with motor skill impairments. It provides them with a comfortable and hassle-free experience, making it easier for them to enjoy their favorite music.
One of the main benefits of a large button MP3 player is its ease of use. With bigger buttons, users can easily navigate through the different functions without any difficulty. This eliminates the frustration of pressing the wrong button or struggling to operate the player. Most large button MP3 players also have simple and straightforward interfaces, making it easier for users to understand and use them. The simplicity of these devices is what makes them stand out among other types of MP3 players.
Another advantage of a large button MP3 player is its accessibility. People with visual impairments or senior citizens often struggle with using small buttons and touch screens. With larger buttons, they can easily locate and press them, making it easier for them to use the player independently. This also promotes their sense of independence and boosts their confidence. Moreover, some large button MP3 players also come with voice control features, making them even more accessible for people with disabilities.
When it comes to design, large button MP3 players are available in various shapes and sizes. Some models have a compact and lightweight design, making them easy to carry around. This is especially useful for people who are always on the go. On the other hand, there are also models that have a larger and sturdier build, making them more durable. These are perfect for outdoor activities like hiking or jogging, where the player is more likely to get bumped or dropped. Furthermore, some large button MP3 players also come with a clip or a strap, making them convenient to wear while exercising.
Apart from their user-friendly design, large button MP3 players also have all the features that a traditional MP3 player has. They can play music, audiobooks, and podcasts, and support various audio formats. Some models also have FM radio tuners, voice recorders, and expandable storage options. This makes them a versatile and all-in-one device for all your entertainment needs.
One of the drawbacks of a large button MP3 player is its limited availability. Compared to other types of MP3 players, there are not many options available in the market. This is because they are designed for a specific target audience, and the demand for them is not as high as other types of MP3 players. As a result, the variety of features and designs may be limited, and they may not be as technologically advanced as other models.
Another drawback of large button MP3 players is their price. Due to their specialized design and limited availability, they are usually more expensive than traditional MP3 players. This may not be a significant issue for some, but it can be a deciding factor for others who are on a budget.
In conclusion, a large button MP3 player is a user-friendly and accessible device that caters to a specific audience. Its ease of use, accessibility, and variety of features are what make it a popular choice among many users. Although it may have some drawbacks, it is still a great option for those who struggle with operating traditional MP3 players. With its unique design and functionality, a large button MP3 player is definitely worth considering for anyone looking to upgrade their music listening experience.
malwarebytes no longer free 2017
In the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity, the threat of malware continues to loom large. Malware, short for malicious software, refers to any type of software designed to cause harm or damage to a computer system, network, or device. It can take many forms, including viruses, worms, Trojan horses, ransomware, and spyware, and is often used by cybercriminals to steal sensitive information, disrupt operations, or extort money from victims. To combat this pervasive threat, many individuals and businesses turn to antivirus software, such as Malwarebytes, for protection. However, in 2017, Malwarebytes made a significant change to its business model, causing many to question whether it is still a viable option for protecting against malware. In this article, we will examine the changes made by Malwarebytes in 2017 and explore whether it is still a viable option for those seeking protection from malware.
In January 2017, Malwarebytes announced that its free version of the software would no longer be available for new users. This came as a shock to many, as the free version had been a popular and effective tool for detecting and removing malware. The company explained that this change was necessary due to the increasing sophistication of malware and the need for more advanced protection. In its place, Malwarebytes launched a new product, Malwarebytes 3.0, which combined antivirus, anti-malware, and anti-exploit capabilities into one comprehensive package. This new product was offered as a 14-day free trial, after which users would have to purchase a subscription to continue using it.
The decision to discontinue the free version of Malwarebytes was met with mixed reactions. On one hand, many users who had relied on the free version for protection against malware were disappointed and felt that Malwarebytes had abandoned them. On the other hand, there were those who understood the need for more advanced protection and were willing to pay for it. However, the introduction of a subscription-based model was a significant departure from the traditional one-time purchase model that many users were accustomed to. This led to concerns about the cost and value of the new product, and whether it was worth the investment.
One of the biggest criticisms of the new Malwarebytes 3.0 was its price. The annual subscription cost was $39.99 for one device, $59.99 for three devices, and $79.99 for five devices. This was significantly higher than the one-time purchase price of the previous version, which cost $24.95 for a lifetime license. This sparked a debate among users about whether the new product was worth the cost, especially considering that there are many other antivirus and anti-malware options available at a lower price point. Some argued that the new features and capabilities of Malwarebytes 3.0 justified the higher cost, while others felt that it was too expensive for what it offered.
Another concern raised by users was the impact of the changes on the effectiveness of Malwarebytes in detecting and removing malware. The previous free version had been highly effective in this regard, and many users were worried that the new product would not live up to its predecessor. Malwarebytes addressed these concerns by stating that the new product had even more advanced detection and removal capabilities, with the ability to detect and eliminate malware that other antivirus software might miss. Additionally, Malwarebytes 3.0 also included real-time protection, which constantly monitors for malicious activity and prevents it from infecting the system. However, some users reported that the new product was not as effective as the previous version in detecting and removing malware, leading to doubts about its reliability.
Aside from these concerns, there were also some technical issues that affected the user experience of Malwarebytes 3.0. Some users reported that the software caused their systems to slow down or crash, while others experienced compatibility issues with other programs. These issues were not widespread, but they did affect a significant number of users, causing frustration and further questioning of the value of the new product.
Despite the criticisms and concerns, there were also many users who were satisfied with Malwarebytes 3.0 and found it to be a valuable tool in their cybersecurity arsenal. The new product received positive reviews from independent testing labs, such as AV-TEST and AV-Comparatives, for its detection and removal capabilities. It also received praise for its user-friendly interface and the ease of use. Additionally, the company regularly updates and improves the product, addressing bugs and technical issues reported by users. This shows a commitment to providing a quality product and addressing the concerns of its customers.
In conclusion, the decision by Malwarebytes to discontinue its free version and introduce a subscription-based model in 2017 was a significant change that sparked debate and raised questions about the company’s direction. While the higher cost and technical issues were valid concerns, the new product, Malwarebytes 3.0, also offered advanced features and capabilities that were highly effective in detecting and removing malware. The mixed reactions from users show that there is no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to protecting against malware, and the effectiveness and value of Malwarebytes 3.0 may vary for different users. Ultimately, it is up to individuals and businesses to decide if Malwarebytes is still a viable option for protecting against malware in today’s landscape.